Today family members do not eat meals together. Is this a positive or negative trend.
It is thought that nowadays family members do not eat dinner together. From my point of view, this notion have both benefits and drawbacks with each person and each situation. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the industrialized world and with the appearence of modern technology that many populations have been replaced by the new innovation such as automatic robots, so family connection is greatly significant for the people life. Not only can the adults provide numerous academic knowledge, valuable information and social experience for their adolesence, which improve the mentality life, but also the creative and imagination abilities of teenagers will be advanced gradually, increase the economic background of their country. Furthermore, the propotion of unemployment and homeless people in their nation will be reduced dramatically which have positive affection for the nation's development. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Hulland Loffty, the famous interviewer and professor, which is expert about the success of postgraduates whoc have good relationship with their parent. The statistic demostrated that nearly eveyon has got plenty of achievement in their career.
However, we can not negate the weakness of this phenomenon for the society. A lot of unneccessary conflict or controversial can be happened by the diffent of generation which widen the distence between adults and their children. Morover, the socioeconomic will be widened where the wealthy children will have more opportunity to achieve in well education, various harmful influence will be led by this phenomenon to the young generations.
To conclude, though my agrument from the essay this statement have its own helpful and negative aspects for their teenagers, so each parent need to have clear plans to improve their children for the development of their nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the industrialized worl...
^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...y populations have been replaced by the new innovation such as automatic robots, so family con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... abilities of teenagers will be advanced gradually, increase the economic backgro...
^^
Line 2, column 691, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...y which have positive affection for the nations development. To illustrate, there was a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lenty of achievement in their career. However, we can not negate the weakness ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... phenomenon to the young generations. To conclude, though my agrument from the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97873554603 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9490104449 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109398629935 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526327530793 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739879477965 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809088538775 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639151582734 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.