Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true that in today's society, food is imported by many countries from various parts of the world. In my opinion, despite a number of inconveniences, this trend should be considered as a very welcome development.
On one hand, critics of importing food from many places in the world tend to point out a combination of reasons. First and foremost, perishable food will be transported by planes which can cause serious issues to the environment, particularly global warming. Since it is transported by planes, the CO2 and other gasses released from them is estimated larger than travelling by cars, trains, etc. Another compelling reason is that local farmers will lose their jobs because they cannot compete with the large international market and may stop producing food altogether. This would mean that we would have to import even more food, creating a loop of people running out of business and more food being imported.
On the other hand, in spite of the downsides given above, I believe that this tendency should be considered as progress. The primary reason is that imported food is not only affordable as it is generally mass-produced but also with better quality. Furthermore, supermarkets can choose a wider range of food at reasonable prices, meaning that we get a wider range of food for a cheaper price.
In conclusion, I believe that although the earth may be suffering from the increasing levels of CO2 and other dangerous gasses, countries imported food from many places of the world is a worthwhile development because it can solve the food problem in some nations order to allow them to focus more on other big issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er than travelling by cars, trains, etc. Another compelling reason is that local ...
^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allowing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: allowing
... the food problem in some nations order to allow them to focus more on other big issues....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, so, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95652173913 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79416193066 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9073482161 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.363636364 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33223293391 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129907352771 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139802696616 0.0667982634062 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220458894761 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902885956488 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.