Today TV channels provide man s sport shows more than women s sport shows why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport

Essay topics:

Today, TV channels provide man’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows, why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?

The number of men's sport programmes broadcast on TV nowadays evidently dominates that of women's sport shows. This is mainly due to the lack of interest in watching sports devoted by women and personally, I consider it to be a terrible idea to balance the airtime of sport shows for both genders.

Women, in fact, are not as fascinated in sports shows as compared to men for some reason. First, most of their time is dedicated to familial duties. Hence, rarely do women have time for sitting in front of the TV screen so does enjoying sport show. Apart from devoting their time for their families, women often spare their hours viewing beauty channels as part of their interests. Therefore, it is not often witness a mother sitting and cheering for the sports team to obtain victory. For such low number of female subscribers to sports channels, sport programmes for women has been starting to fade of from airtime and may eventually reach complete disappearance.

Since very few women are keen on sport, I therefore, think that keeping sport shows of both sexes equal is totally unnecessary. As broadcasters make money from mainly the quantity of subscriptions, they need to prioritize shows which capture interests of viewers in order to end up with a profit. Also, increasing the time allotment of female sport shows perhaps, takes away the airtime of other more essential and attractive channels as well. For instance, lesser cooking shows or drama series which is known to attract mothers are aired to provide time space for these uninteresting shows. Thus, to maintain a large proportion of subscribers, broadcasters has no choice but to inevitably cut down on sport shows for women.

In conclusion, even though males sports are more prioritized than females', balancing the programme number for both genders is considered not at all beneficial. Instead, alternating sports with some culinary programmes may be a good idea to ensure that the number of shows for both genders is equal.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, may, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01807228916 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69978332813 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569277108434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1150992964 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.066666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.537146229264 0.244688304435 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199109377563 0.084324248473 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10218977653 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344789490218 0.151304729494 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821954778297 0.056905535591 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.