Topic 5 : Governments around the world are investing heavily in space exploration. Some people say this money should be spent on helping people living in poverty, or with significant health problems. To what extend do you agree ?
There is a widely held belief that governments around the world should concentrate on spending money to explore outer space, while others hold a view that investing in assisting people in needy areas or dealing with health issues is more important. From my perspective, I agree that governments need to support social problems more than research.
On the one hand, there are some advantages of spending on space exploration in different aspects of the economy. To begin with, discovering outer space is a necessary way to raise human awareness in terms of planets. For instance, thanks to the enhancement of astronomy, people can understand life on other planets and create some major projects such as satellites or weather forecasts. Besides that, exploring space seems to be the need for the future because of climate change. It is clear that if global warming becomes a serious problem, humans have to move to another planet to start a new life.
On the other hand, social issues are the best concern for governments currently instead of long-term plans. First of all, a range of underprivileged people in this society needs to be pay attention to. To exemplify, the sick, the disabled, and the unemployed living in poverty without a source of income so that financial supports are essential to ensure their lives. Moreover, health problems also an aspect that needs to be ameliorated as soon as possible. The COVID-19 pandemic is an example, investing in vaccines and medical treatments is fundamental to protect citizens from death.
To sum up, spending budget on discovering or supporting social missions brings many benefits. These are people's awareness and maintaining basic life but I believe that governments should tackle with current difficulty on society to create balanced communities
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, such as, first of all, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21305841924 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82320340019 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621993127148 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3827295648 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279427464224 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791307029712 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618919367513 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158014230121 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630542103041 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.