Topic 9: It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be. Give possible reasons and your recommendations.
In comparison with the recent past, the relationship between family members is becoming less and less relevant. There are several reasons which can be identified to account for this unfortunate development, but I believe that there are effective measures can be implemented to address the weakness of family ties.
The primary reason is that the family get-together has shrunk. People are increasingly moving to another city or country because of work, study or simply in search of a better life. While it is possible to keep in touch through communication means, an email or phone call is not equal to face-to-face interaction. As a result, the importance of bonds of kinship is gradually fading from their minds. Another significant cause of this trend is the addiction to electronic gadgets. This contemporary world drives people to become technophile. For example, family members spend their free time surfing the Internet or playing video games rather than talking to other members.
In view of such alienation within families, urgent steps must be taken, in my opinion. For members of families who live away from one another, regular contact on the phone can bring them the care that they need. Family ties can be maintained and strengthened by commitment with love. Take time to do what other family members would like or commit time to finding the right methods that will create a stronger bond.
In conclusion, there are some obvious reasons why family relationships today have been weakened. However, I believe that a close family relationship can surely be maintained as long as we realise the significant role of it in our lives. Instead of confining ourselves to our space, we must come out of it and let others in too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
In comparison with the recent past, the relationship ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople to become technophile. For example, family members spend their free time sur...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...come out of it and let others in too.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09027777778 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7738774701 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631944444444 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0574862725 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165099477794 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049497068699 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451820914483 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991514823234 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218870290634 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.