Topic: What are the influences of the Internet on youth development?
Throughout the course of human history, it would be a huge mistake not to mention the Internet in the lists of groundbreaking inventions that human beings have ever devised in this day and age. Admittedly, the Internet has opened up a new chapter for mankind in general, and most importantly, has a range of impacts on youth development in particular, namely on their connection, insight, and opportunities.
To begin with, the emergent of the Internet has formed a bond among young people. To be more precise, by means of the Internet, every youngster would be able to connect, make friends, or even socialize with others all over the nation and the globe. It is such a miracle that the young could keep in touch with their friends even though they are at a very far distance from each other. What is more, once the young have a chance to socialize with one another, they could also gain more experiences, insight, and interesting stories from their peers, which they could have not accomplished without the Internet. By socializing with international communities, youngsters will be able to not only enhance their usage of English but also learn to speak other languages as well, which is a precondition of the process of integration into the rest of the globe.
In the second place, with the help of the Internet, each youngster could acquire more and more insight into every aspect of life than ever before. As mentioned, with the Internet, young people could contact and make friends with foreign peers, which means that they could inquire more about international peers’ strategies to study or work productively, or simply have a better understanding of their perspectives about life. Moreover, it is expected that they could also gain more knowledge about different cultures and be conscious of respecting those. To illustrate this, in recent years, there is a sort of lifestyle in Sweden that impressed many young people to decide to chase and design their life in that way. It is “Lagom” which means “enough”. Additionally, a majority of the elderly acknowledge that the young these days are much more conversant with modern technologies than other ages. I suppose that this also has much to do with the influences of the Internet.
Ultimately, the Internet network has created dozens of work and study opportunities for the young. With the help of social media, it is getting more and more effortless for everyone, specifically the young, to seek an appropriate job ranging from freelance to paperwork. Personally, I believe this, without a doubt, could decrease the unemployment rate and help the unemployed survive in today’s society. What is more, the internet provides us not only job opportunities but also study opportunities. By surfing social networking sites, it is easier than ever before for the young, especially students, to study their major via social platforms such as YouTube. In addition, it would also give the students a chance to become exchange students, who can freely study in another nation and have a better understanding of that culture as well, which would never happen in the old days.
By and large, I pen down saying that the Internet is one of the most astonishing watershed moments that human beings have ever been through, which has three beneficial effects on youth development: their connection, insight, and opportunities. Consequently, I suppose that the young must utilize the positive side of the Internet to be a better version of themselves, which is good for not only the young themselves but also the whole society in today’s world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, second, so, well, as for, even so, i suppose, in addition, in general, in particular, sort of, such as, by and large, to begin with, what is more, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 41.998997996 212% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3017.0 1615.20841683 187% => OK
No of words: 596.0 315.596192385 189% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06208053691 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94096258147 4.20363070211 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86914272534 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 176.041082164 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468120805369 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 925.2 506.74238477 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 17.0 4.76152304609 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7182389851 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.136363636 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.31818181818 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131301268723 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454628602067 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538682127729 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836598180243 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316382993848 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.