The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
families, throughout the world spend less time on having meals together, affecting the precious relationship among family members. The reasons behind are not only caused by the harsh demand from working environments in society, and also the rapid development of technology.
The fundamental reason is that jobs occupy employees most of the time, as having a full time job is enormously demanding in our community. although working hours is set in the employment contracts, staffs are forced to work overtime in days off. For instance, in Hong Kong, 90 percent of labour cannot off duty on time, it results in lacking of rest time. Subsequently, they prefer taking rest when having free time, in order to fullfill the requirments form their works. Otherwise, they may lost their job, as not having sufficient productivity in their works. Moreover, since modern technology helps people to connect with others conveniently, they would rather choose to interact with family members instead of face to face gathering when after work.
it is clear that the detrimental drawback is broken family relationship. As Assigned time is the key for maintaining health family relationship, people are encouraged to spend more time in their family. There is an intensive research by Oxford University, it indicates that if people do not have sufficient time in family life, relationship among them would be more distancing. although social workers can help them to rebulid the relationship, it cannot be recovered.
To recapitulate, working demand is one of the reason why the meals time gets lesser than before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Families
families, throughout the world spend less time o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...employees most of the time, as having a full time job is enormously demanding in our comm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
... enormously demanding in our community. although working hours is set in the employment ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... to face gathering when after work. it is clear that the detrimental drawback ...
^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'intensive research'.
Suggestion: intensive research
...end more time in their family. There is an intensive research by Oxford University, it indicates that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...ip among them would be more distancing. although social workers can help them to rebulid...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cannot be recovered. To recapitulate, working demand is one of the reason why ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2734375 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87150560396 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62109375 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7517107372 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.846153846 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0823519566954 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341312688121 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385705257228 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737411672412 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431124723405 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.