The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
In contemporary society, modern families are not eating meals together as often as in the past. There are some factors leading to this trend, and this may have several impacts on household and community as a whole.
There are some reasons for this phenomenon. First of all, cozy meals with together family members are vanishing because of the hectic work schedule. Employees are not spending time with their family members to complete their tasks. Moreover, the development of the society which leads to a large amount of job and gives more chance to earn money than in the past. For example, some people often spend spare-time to seek out a new job in the evening after they finished work at their offices in the daytime because they need to find money that can help their young children be a good life.
This trend will bring some harmful impacts to every family on earth. Firstly, family members get together to eat cozy meals become invisible. This will make children have bad habits because they lack guideline and share from parents. Secondly, parents have less time to talk with their children, and that will lose the family affection. According to me, I claim that young children have a bad habit due to their parents are not teaching them. Therefore, the crime rate increases in modern life because they do not know how to become a good person.
To sum up, the disappearance of family meals attribute to various factors. This has several influences on both families and societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...nd that will lose the family affection. According to me, I claim that young children have a bad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83984375 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36314565727 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4258443188 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172470412048 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734998921971 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835929935879 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120895955063 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337180077827 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.