It is now possible for scientist and tourist to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
With the development of scientist technology, people can travel to natural areas such as the South Pole. This has some drawbacks and benefits of this trend.
People visit isolate natural lands that have some positives. Firstly, this is a new strategy and an interesting way to attract people in the world. Going to other places or countries has been common for most people. Therefore, people can explore new places such as the South Pole or Amazon rainforest which can create a new exciting for foreign people. this can give unforgettable memories and valuable experiences for visitors. Secondly, when people visit the remote natural environment, especially scientists might acquire more knowledge about natural habitats. For instance, when visitors visit the South Pole, they can see the life of the polar bears, this is a rare animal.
On the other hand, I believe that this trend brings some drawbacks. First of all, the natural environment remote by co-operation which is a dangerous place and hidden risky for people because people can be attacked by dangerous animals such as tiger if co-operation do not enough labor and equipment to protect visitors. Moreover, the natural environment lands need to invest plenty of money for building it. Therefore, the cost is often higher than in other entertainment areas. it seems to be the scientists and rich people can afford. Therefore, this will limit the number of visitors.
To sum up, I believe that people visit the remote natural environment will have some drawbacks outweigh advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...eate a new exciting for foreign people. this can give unforgettable memories and val...
^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...gher than in other entertainment areas. it seems to be the scientists and rich peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.196 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70870891755 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7720703246 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1875 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255166999045 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818458631322 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878241164098 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168502960416 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687767940523 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.