Traditional food is undergoing great changes and being replaced by new diets. What do you think are the reasons and what do you think about this phenomenon?
There are many various traditional cuisines in the world, which have evolved over the centuries alongside with the human beings. This means that each traditional meal has absorbed all the uniqueness of the certain lifestyle and history of the nation. Although the alterations in long-established taste experience may cause majority backlash against it, I believe that adjustments in habitual food help people improve their life and health issues.
It is obvious that cultural and economical exchange increases food diversity. Moreover, the successful world trade has given us an opportunity to taste a great variety of dishes, so we have been permanently implementing new tastes in our ordinary diet, enriching it. For instance, people in each corner of the world can purchase some exotic fruits or spice in the grocery nearby. As a result, including them into ordinary dietary choice, we obtain more useful nutrients, which positively impacts the metabolic processes in our bodies.
Another reason to endorse the variety of flavors is are constant changes in of human lifestyle. For example, people are busier today than even thirty years ago, so it is better for them to cook a semi-finished meal of foreign cuisine than to prepare local dishes. Furthermore, the increased number of restaurants and catering service allow people to forget about cooking chores. Consequently, citizens have more possibilities to discover new tastes or even make experiments with it. By doing this, they acquire new impressions, become open-minded and change their outlook on dietary preferences.
In conclusion, though some people find drawbacks in traditional cuisine changes, I reckon that this phenomenon is an irreversible process of cultural exchange and diversity. We should take into consideration that changes in meal can be helpful both for the health and intelligence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-10 | mary.ssherr | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007. 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information on the percentage of Canadians gave money to charitable organisations by age range for the years 2000 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main f 100
- The widespread use of the Internet has thought many problems. What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of the web? What solutions can you suggest? 89
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47750865052 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95705463669 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640138408304 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4720355509 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12688520117 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420680895445 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369278102743 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736138516518 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023655840049 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.