Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and Government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantage?
An increasing number of traffic transportations and buildings is overwhelming, so some businesses are encouraged to relocate from urban areas to less crowded cities. While I believe this will bring certain advantages, I am convinced that it is likely to have many disadvantages on society.
Undoubtedly, there are some disadvantages for the movement of organizations from cities to countries. The major problem is that companies might face the risk of losing their high-quality workforce. It becomes clear that not everyone is willing to settle down in the suburbs where there is the lack of restaurants, shopping centers and public transit vehicles so they would seek another job to maintain their current living standards. Whereas, most people living in the small towns and villages do not sufficient education to undertake intellectual jobs because skilled workers are a rarity in rural areas. Consequently, enterprises might waste their time and money to train their new employees.
Nevertheless, I believe moving business and their facilities to rural areas would be much more beneficial. Firstly, such relocation of companies will cause urban populations to shrink substantially. If cooperations like Samsung offer accommodation to their employees near their workplaces, people from rural areas who work for those companies would no longer have to travel to city centers to work, thus this will relieve pressure on urban housing supply system as well as reducing traffic congestion during rush hours. Secondly, by adopting the policy, the firms could create more job opportunities, boosting the development of deprived areas. For example, countryside dwellers can opt to work in factories with higher pay rather than agricultural work which help them improve their standard of living, thereby paving the way for the growth of national economy.
In conclusion, after analyzing the pros and cons of business relocation, I think the merits is likely to outweigh the demerits. However, the Government should consider seriously to find out the best solution to deal with this hot problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-28 | stark321 | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-01 | tranguyen1234 | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-01 | tranguyen1234 | 73 | view |
| 2017-06-14 | veo121195 | 71 | view |
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- in some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 61
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- in some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 67
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both view and give your opinion 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45987654321 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00199820411 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66049382716 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1640394759 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.357142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232465938205 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702038627625 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773813727336 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13265837983 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449139586012 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.