Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, migrating to big cities has been becoming a trend as people from different areas looking for life-changing opportunities, thus causing many inconveniences such as lack of housing supply and traffic jam. There are comments for that by relocating large businesses, including their factories and employees, to rural regions, these issues can be properly addressed. In my perspective, I agree with this view, however, some other initiatives should be implemented at the same time if we expect to solve traffic and housing problems effectively.
Moving businesses and their facilities to the countryside will decrease urban population substantially, as successful companies, such as Apple, provide work for thousands of people, will relieve pressure on urban housing supply systems. Another apparent advantage of a decreased population is lower flows of traffic which help reduce traffic congestion. For example, most people prefer privately owned vehicles because they are more comfortable, faster and more flexible for doing multiple tasks on one trip than almost any form of public transport, which results in endless daily traffic jams like Los Angeles at 5.00 PM. Therefore, if big companies are based in a rural area and offer accommodation to their employees near their workplace, this will no longer be the case.
Nonetheless, I think that the mentioned problems are complicated and can only be addressed completely by the introduction of some other measures. One of the main causes of traffic congestion is the narrow road system that does not provide enough travel needs of the people. So, building wider roads and motorways will allow a greater number of vehicles moving, both private and public, and thence will lessen traffic jam. Housing projects should be focused on building to meet the demand of residents.
In conclusion, I agree that relocating businesses in the countryside is one way to deal with traffic and housing problems. I also believe that we need a combination of this approach and a number of other actions, as listed above, to tackle these problems in a more comprehensive manner.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3293768546 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92939513001 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611275964392 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.128828116 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.153846154 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280006189474 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879923204845 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526498412957 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152045557845 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422137377947 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.