Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree?
People used to be limited in the choice for lifelong partners but currently transnational marriage has become ubiquitous around the world, which triggers some deprecating comments against this brand new form of marriage. From my perspective, the criticism is unfounded and both the couple and their children can benefit a lot from it.
Admittedly, some opponents may defend their ideas by proposing the problems during the marriage for the sake of the potential cultural shock. However, a man and a woman can hardly get married without understanding and love to each other and these two essential factors, as the precondition for a marriage, are the best tools to minimize the possible conflicts that may be encountered by the husbands and wives from distinctive cultural backgrounds. That is to say, the couple have already foreseen the misunderstanding or controversies in their marriage and think it acceptable from the very beginning , or otherwise there is little likelihood for them to enter the church and promised to love and care each other before God.
Additionally, the whole family, not only the couples, but also the children, may thus have more possibilities for their future life. On account of the present acts for citizenship in most countries, either part in an international marriage has the freedom to become the citizen in his or her partner’s country or at least is able to obtain Permanent Residence in this country. Therefore, resources including job opportunities, medical care or other social welfare become easily available. Besides, children are naturally born in a bi-cultural background, which helps to cultivate their language abilities and enable them to think in a more flexible manner.
In conclusion, transnational marriage should not be regarded as a cursed one which bring sorrow and harm. Instead, as long as this couple is married in the name of love, the whole family will be more benefited rather than suffer from the marriage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nk it acceptable from the very beginning , or otherwise there is little likelihood...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, at least, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27129337539 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00655409218 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605678233438 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5364112675 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.909090909 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8181818182 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113260126232 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451246782459 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349965562601 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802579531607 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485018907791 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.