Trees are essential for the existence of the human race as they provide the oxygen that we need to survice. Yet, daily all around the globe large areas of woodland are being detroyed. Many people feel that they as individuals can do nothing and that only governments and large companies can halt the destruction. How far do you agree or disagree with this.
The process of deforestation has become an alarming issue in our society. Although trees play a vital role in the existence of human beings, more and more forests and areas of woodland are being devastated. Some people think that this trouble is too big for individuals to resolve, while I believe that solving this problem also requires the participation of individuals.
There are several reasons why only the government and big companies can deal with this problem. Initially, only the government has the power to do this. For example, the government can make laws to limit the exploitation of forests as well as punish strictly people who destroy areas of woodland for their own ends. Secondly, the cost of some environmental projects are prohibitive for individuals so they can afford to deal with these problems. For instance, in Vietnam afforestation cost billions of VND, so this is too expensive for individuals and only large companies or government can manage perfectly.
However, this problem can be only tackle with the participation of people in many cases. For example individuals, groups like schools can sponsor the planting of new trees. When a lot of people come together in this way, it can be very effective. Trees could be planted in schools and children could be taught to look after and care for them. By appreciating the value of trees, young people will respect them more and therefore, not want to destroy them. Moreover, people can use other materials to replace wood in some fields such as construction. It means that the exploitation of wood can be limited. This is also positive effect as well as makes the process of producing goods developed.
To sum up, trees play a vital role in enhancing our quality of life also for our existence. Dealing with the destruction of woodland needs cooperation between government, big companies and the citizens. One of the best ways is the government should issue policies to encourage the engagement of people. This will help to lessen the pressure on the government and raise public awareness of preserving woodland and forests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...viduals so they can afford to deal with these problem. For instance, in Vietnam afforestation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Trees
...r in this way, it can be very effective.Trees could be planted in schools and childre...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in many cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05172413793 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86672174085 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.57345947 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5263157895 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233339205148 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069395588465 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478766294809 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134153833806 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461809955695 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.