British and Australian governments have offered a special situation for a criminal person by which a jury cannot judge by his or her past criminal record. While there are some people who claim that this opportunity should be banned, personally I believe that it is completely fair to judge a person based on the current circumstances. This essay will discuss why this policy should be kept.
There are various reasons why a jury must decide about a certain case regardless of the defendant’s previous criminal record. First, there is no room for doubt that each case is totally different from other cases. For example, financial crimes and murder are completely mutually exclusive. Hence, a criminal person should be judged only based on the current situation. Second, as we have already known, prisons have been built for reforming delinquents. If a person went to a jail for his previous crimes, he would not be judged according to his past criminal record because maybe he was reformed. Third, a jury consists of about 12 people in order to reach the best decision in many cases. It is intuitively obvious that if we wanted to decide about a case based on the previous record, is it necessary to establish juries? It is clear that this is the responsibility of a jury to decide fairly.
On the other hand, despite the above-mentioned reasons why this decision should be taken in the current moment, making a decision based on the previous record adversely affect people who are being accused in the court. These effects hesitate people to be reformed, even if they go to jails. As an illustration, imagine a man, who was arrested previously because of a dangerous crime and he is already reformed, do something wrong again that it is not an important case and he has to go to court in order to be judged by juries. If a jury decides negatively about his activity based on his previous action, he would never be a good man after leaving a jail. Furthermore, having access to all information, juries can easily make mistakes unintentionally regardless of paying attention to the current situation.
It can be concluded that juries should judge a criminal person by using the current information about the case. Releasing the further information about the past must not be allowed at all.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, third, while, as to, for example, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87979539642 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81812884681 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496163682864 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0098051328 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.421052632 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36857959236 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117081914763 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697877735792 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251697818632 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510120302631 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.