Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Some universities have the same number of seats for male and female students in all of the subjects and some others do not. I completely agree that there should be an equal chance for both genders to be accepted in their desired major.
In my opinion, when there is an equal chance for both genders, they can focus on their skills and knowledge and compete with each other to take the seat they deserve. The evaluation is based on their abilities, not their gender and it is much fairer. It is said that some courses or jobs are suitable for men and some others for women but, I believe that it is wrong because we can not divide people into two groups and make such strict rules for them. Both men and women have different capacities and they can do whatever they are interested in. for example in my country women can not study in some courses of engineering although they are so talented and they would be successful if they have the chance.
On the other hand, we know that dividing people into male and female groups is not reasonable these days. Gender is a spectrum from male to female. This division just limits people and will not allow them to follow their dreams based on their interests and abilities. Also, it will not let us see the world differently, from the other’s point of view. There are a lot of people who know themselves as nonbinary and wouldn’t like to call them female or male.
In conclusion, my view is that universities should be focused on the skills, knowledge, and abilities of the students, instead of their genders and, make the entrance chance equal for all of the people based on their interests
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...f seats for male and female students in all of the subjects and some others do not. I comp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...and, make the entrance chance equal for all of the people based on their interests
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57627118644 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35449535504 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0565426696 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.846153846 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132628771614 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546052373336 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646178386025 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108861196571 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942488498101 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.