Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that each domain in universities should have the same amount of male and female in class. Personally I disagree with this perspective and I will elaborate my arguments below.
To begin with, it is impractical to limit the number of female and male students. Universities may not be able to recruit enough students since some subjects are less attractive to one of the genders. For example, nursing usually receives fewer applicants from male candidates than women. Therefore, in order to recruit sufficient students, schools have to lower the admission requirement. Consequently, professors may find it difficult to teach due to a large amount of unqualified students in classes. Thus, the academic level will be reduced and the reputation of university may be ruined.
In addition, it is unfair to allocate applications by gender. Both men and women should have equal access to higher educational opportunities. For instance, it makes no sense to reject an applicant from an excellent female student just because the positions for women in this course are full and have to fill the rest places with men. Furthermore, Students should be encouraged to enter the domain which they have passion on based on their motivations and abilities than their sexes. It is natural that different sex has different preferences on school subjects, it is leading by sex differences and we should not go against it.
In conclusion, universities should not have the restriction of equal quantity for both genders because it has negative effects on both schools and students.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20784313725 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9463379547 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1861666928 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8571428571 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190338517463 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637564956061 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506172647462 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118608752186 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267855996746 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.