The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant.
The three charts compare the change in expenditure of a UK school in three different years.
As shown in the charts, teacher’s salaries constituted the largest percentage of total spending throughout the period. Specifically, it increased from 40% in 1981 to 50% in 1991 and then dropped by 5% in 2001. While other worker’s salaries has been declined constantly, from 28% in 1981 to 15% in 2001.
Spending on resources such as books and furniture and equipment is similar in 1981, at 15%. Expenditure of resources such as books experienced a rise to 20% in 1991 and then dropped to 9% in 2001. Money spent on furniture and equipment decreased dramatically to only 5% in 1991, but this figure rose remarkably to 23% in 2001, became the second largest expense at that year.
There was a steady increase in insurance which grew from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001.
Overall, the majority of money was spend on teacher’s salaries while other worker’s salaries decreased rapidly. The spending of resources such as books and furniture and equipment both experienced fluctuations. Insurance saw a slightly rise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
.... Overall, the majority of money was spend on teacher's salaries while other ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...experienced fluctuations. Insurance saw a slightly rise.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12432432432 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08690771963 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5918624542 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1818181818 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161114688802 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669034097292 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571883159515 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104482996296 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642143001829 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.