Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged.
Do you think this a positive or negative development?
In the contemporary world, fossil fuels contribute to the majority of energy resource. While technological advancements made it possible to use renewable resources substitute for fossil fuels. It is a positive development due to several reasons and I am going to explain in detail in this essay.
Firstly, according to statistics given by a Norway energy consulting company, 2017 was recorded the lowest year for discovered oil reserves globally. As fossil fuels lack sustainability, it is true that we are on the verge of running out of fossil fuels. Therefore, we are in an urgent need of using renewable in order to develop sustainably. The utilization of renewable resources can alleviate the shortage of fossil fuels. Secondly, alternative energy such as solar, wind power and nuclear power are more environmental-friendly. It is acknowledged that a large amount of emissions and exhaust gases are produced in the progress of utilizing fossil fuels, which would lead to tremendous damage to the environment. Renewable source like nuclear power could help to reduce carbon emissions that cause global warming. Thus, environmental problems can be released by using alternative sources. Furthermore, the conflicts between countries can be eased to some extent with the development of renewable sources. It is acknowledged that plenty of wars and conflicts between different counties are caused by competition for petroleum and gas sources. Consequently, using alternative sources could reduce the dependence of fossil fuels for countries lack these natural sources.
In conclusion, I believe that human can benefit from developing alternative sources. This should be the global priority to invest in such research and development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56981132075 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26096256104 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2670717222 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.25 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262816095231 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806246501313 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564666363671 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159793937349 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529791306893 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.