Tertiary education has become essential for better job opportunities all over the world and a lot of youngsters are planning to get Bachelor's and Master's degree. It is often thought that the quantity of girls and boys who are accepted to study at the University ought to be equal in every faculty. However, I strongly disagree with this view and I believe that applicants talents and their job priorities always cause disparity in the numbers.
Individuals' interests often differ according to their gender and it would bu unjust to accept exact number of male and female students. Although, some think that girls should be on par with boys in every field, this does not necessarily mean that they should be interested in the same subjects.Yet, in psychological terms, girls are more talented in social sciences, whilst boys are likely to be passionate about exact sciences. As a result, different gender members apply for different University faculties and this makes it impossible to get exact number of students for every subject.
Another factor that affects the difference between students of different gender is job priority. Although, I acknowledge that both gender members prefer high salary and sometimes similar working hours, I suppose there will be other effects too as the tasks that job require. To illustrate, many girls would find it challenging to work for military forces because of their timetable and requirements. Therefore, distribution of equal places for both gender members can be unacceptable.
In conclusion, I am convinced that universities should not consider the gender while accepting students. Applicants' interests and job requirements should play an important role in the number of girls and boys in the class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Yet
...ould be interested in the same subjects.Yet, in psychological terms, girls are more...
^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
...e, many girls would find it challenging to work for military forces because of their ti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, i suppose, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27956989247 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86768367605 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5770609319 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8603895088 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175901687923 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664321520468 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566440426786 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108928714882 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053241878266 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.