The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?
There is no wonder that cars have become a conventional method of transporting in modern times for its convenience. However, a range of issues has been identified and need to be addressed. From my perspective, I would argue that we should discourage people to use cars.
Besides the benefits, the popularity of cars negatively affects human’s life in many aspects. Vehicles are the major sources of environmental pollution, which leads to global warming and energy crisis. Another serious problem that can be obviously witnessed is human’s dependence on transporting by cars. This cause various negative effects on people’s health and well-being due to the lack of physical movements. Moreover, the rates of traffic jams, and more serious are car accidents, which cause a huge number of casualties, keep rising day by day since people prefer using cars to walking or cycling. Furthermore, it is not easy to afford having a car at all due to the cost people have to pay for warranty and repair each year.
In my opinion, the government should impose a strict restriction on using cars in order to resolve these problems. We should encourage people to walk and cycle. These means of transportation are cheap and available for everybody, they will help us save a large sum of money. Also, there will be a reduction in gas emissions if people travel on foot or by bicycles. Walking and cycling will help people achieve flexibility and fitness, thus increase community health. Moreover, this rarely causes accidents so it definitely brings us safety.
To sum up, I personally think that cars should be banned to ensure long-term benefits and a better future for human’s life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to have'.
Suggestion: to have
.... Furthermore, it is not easy to afford having a car at all due to the cost people hav...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'These means'?
Suggestion: This means; These means
...uld encourage people to walk and cycle. These means of transportation are cheap and availab...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12230215827 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92997480228 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63309352518 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8322071866 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292491954637 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842242218815 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835846379073 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157349379399 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468394137274 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.