The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?
With the advancement in the transportation field, cars have been used on a larger scale than it was before. Despite of being accessible, the mass uses of cars has created many side-effects. These problems need to be identified so as to find a better approach to solve the issue.
There are three major problems associated with the frequent use of cars of which the public could clearly aware. Firstly, since cars emitted exhaust into the environment, the dramatic use of cars means that more emission will be exposed to the ecosystem. These are the main reasons caused air pollution, or in the worst scenario, causing greenhouse effect. Secondly, due to the efficient of cars, more and more people refused to take other transports. The increasing in the number of vehicles on the street results in the traffic jam in the rush hours. Finally, sometimes, driving is not the safe way to travel. According to a report, 80% casualties every year is the consequence of car accidents.
From the problems above, some proposed a resolution is to impose restriction on the use of cars. However, there is a less severe approach. If car manufacture could produce an environmentally friendly, like solar power or hydrogen, it is then not necessary to worried about the exhaust from such a vehicle. Furthermore, if drivers are educated properly before licensing, safety will be the prioritize.
In conclusion, I deem that there are three primary disadvantages of cars overuse, and discouraging cars may not be a permanent cure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s. These problems need to be identified so as to find a better approach to solve the iss...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...operly before licensing, safety will be the prioritize. In conclusion, I deem that there are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01984126984 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93919600263 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7958983009 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322457584013 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873705517731 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754043906269 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185401387397 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446593518636 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.