The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In the contemporary world, thanks to the omnipresence of online social networking sites, social media has garnered significant attention among the masses. Debatable as it is, the positive aspect of online conversations via apps functioning as a way to supersede face-to-face communication prevail over its downsides.
Given the fact that the current world is being challenged by numerous issues, it is sensible to believe in the dark side. First and foremost, there is a growing likelihood that human beings may become robots, or emotionless species. To be more precise, sitting and having eyes glued to the screen of hand-held smartphones for hours to surf the Internet or the newsfeed of several social sites greatly contribute to the sedentary lifestyle, turning people into couch potatoes. In this spectrum, they have the propensity to forget the invaluable assets of interpersonal communication. Besides, allocating plenty of time to overusing social networking channels is likely to exert a detrimental effect on the style of writing and speaking of the young. It is often the case that due to the impact of media sites, abbreviated words or phrases in academic essays and formal emails have been coming into vogue for quite a long time, which is a testament to the detriment of youngsters' mental health.
Despite the above demerits, I personally believe that when it comes to communication, social media does more good than harm. To begin with, social networking sites have opened the door to more opportunities to stay in touch with our beloved individuals irrespective of geographical barriers. As a matter of fact, such renowned applications nowadays as Facebook, Skype offer an optimal medium in paving a way for close connection with our family members and relatives on a daily basis. What is more, social media is conducive to the task of expanding a business by virtue of marketing via networking sites. In this digital age, company managers are capable of keeping their employees informed of the new initiatives as well as future goals by posting their campaigns on social media, which is instrumental in saving a great deal of time and money from the traditional methods of taking advantage of magazines or newspapers.
To sum up, for the aforementioned reasons, I hold an unwavering belief that the positive effects social media bring to our lives far outstrip its devastating consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. 78
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 73
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 78
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey which asked people the causes of crime 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, well, speaking of, as a matter of fact, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2293814433 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01102744399 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1846550358 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.928571429 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14197253459 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440416654972 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401046064584 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895619242726 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522732051961 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.