we are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. they are used in business comma hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. what things will they be used for in future? is this dependence on computer a good thing or should we be more suspicious of their benefits.
Modern era is all about technology. The man transformed his life tremendously only because of this science. However, it is often questioned that, Is dependency on computers for work is good or not? I think depending on the things which is created by us is not bad. In this essay I shall explore the future uses of computers and give reasons to support my view point.
There is science in every aspect of life, and science of today becomes technology of tomorrow; this is case of computers.Computer have a couple of future uses like, space exploring. The dangerous choes which can harm human life can be done by computer controlled robots. Moreover, complicated surgeries can also be done by use of robots. An experimental data was published in "Hindustan Times", indicating the level of accuracy of computers compared to humans. It was proved that computers can do work more efficiently with less mistakes than man.
Some people often comment that, use of computers in daily protein is not good, which is very wrong prospective of individuals. Computers are not self operated, they cannot work by itself; it is the human mind that give the command to computers. The values and measures are fed manually in computer, which it follows in order to give results.
To sum up, technology is meant for the benefits of mankind. No doubt, technology is two sided sword; that can be a good servant but a dangerous master; but use of gadgets which reduces our work load and saves time with no error is not bad.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Computer
... of tomorrow; this is case of computers.Computer have a couple of future uses like, spac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...row; this is case of computers.Computer have a couple of future uses like, space exp...
^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...uters can do work more efficiently with less mistakes than man. Some people often...
^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'sword' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'swords'.
Suggestion: swords
...kind. No doubt, technology is two sided sword; that can be a good servant but a dange...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, i think, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84230769231 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85158266032 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2688741117 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235052219677 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716760813964 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480458479725 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131205722214 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437068293453 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.