The utilization of computers in different areas is becoming more and more prevalent in everyday life. We can hardly find a profession without the intervention of computers. From my point of view, this trend will be even more prevailing in the near future. Some argue that computers may be a threat to humankind, although I believe that if we use them correctly, it will never happen.
As per the rapid emerging of computer technology, I think the better question is to ask if there will be things in the future that do NOT concern computers at all, since this technology is spreading to every corner of our lives. For instance, driverless cars which are guided by computers, are becoming really popular throughout the world. Therefore, rare parts of our lives will survive from the enhancements of computers.
In terms of dependence on computers and whether this is a good thing or we should care about it, two factors come to mind. The first is the accuracy of their results and actions, and the second is the moral aspects of their behavior. With regard to the former, studies show that human error can be as devastating as that of computers. As the human mind is definitely much intricate and we are not able to perfectly control it, while programming computers and improving their functions by means of technology and science, is absolutely possible. On the other hand, ethics are another concern of people regarding computers, as we saw in the movie “Matrix” that one-day computers may catch control of our world in opposition to human. From my personal standpoint, this is a misconception and can be easily solved by implementing regulations based on humanity in the production of computers.
To sum up, from my perspective, the fast emergence of computer technology within our lives is seemingly inevitable and this would be more beneficial to engage in practices in order to enhance the technical and ethical aspects of computer’s activity to make it safe for society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, really, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, to sum up, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97005988024 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89552382668 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562874251497 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6367572231 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.571428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312352800596 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998339555098 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747926185129 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182276524929 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596367974976 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.