Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that rich nations should welcome more asylum seekers and give them food and shelter. This essay totally agrees with that statement because it is a moral obligation that the rich countries can easily afford.
The first reason why developed countries should open its doors for refugees is that it is not morally acceptable not to do so. In other words, all men are equal and they should always stand by one another. Innocent people that are running away from war zones should not be left alone to face death and misery as they do not have anywhere to go. For example, Germany had accepted more than five million Syrian refugees since the beginning of the Syrian crisis and the majority of them where women and children.
The second main reason is that wealthy nations can handle the costs of supporting people fleeing from their own countries. That is to say, humanitarian aid and accommodation facilities will not cause any financial strain on the government's budget. In fact the economy of the recipient countries might benefit from the extra labor force that refugees provide. For instance, a recent study published by The Guardian showed that only 0.5% of the German national income was spent on Syrian asylum seekers. The same study illustrated that 60% of Syrian refugees are currently working in factories and other industrial institutions.
In conclusion, rich nations should not prevent refugees from seeking basic assistance on their territory. Because it is a humanitarian obligation and it is not harmful to the economy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05813953488 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55707342126 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600775193798 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0163307086 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.384615385 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216543858523 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656541273191 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541372467131 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123431768636 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052783432323 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.