Refugees should be assisted with basic necessities of life by rich nations. This essay agrees with this idea because developed countries can easily afford the expenses of immigrants and it will also enhance the economic growth of their own country.
First world countries have huge amount of resources to assist asylum seekers. This is to say that they could provide shelter as well as food to the people of numerous countries who are affected by any kind of war or natural calamity. Thus, that refugees can restart their life at another place with less efforts. For example, the USA and UK have accepted most of the Syrian refugees in 2011 at the time of civil war in Syria, and it was the welcome move of developed countries as other nation will also get motivation from this.
Another reason why developed countries should provide places to influx of refugees is that it would be beneficial for them to grow more in every field such as technology, medicine, agriculture and industry by getting large amount of workforce and expertise who will make efforts to earn money. As a result, that countries will do more progress and will become affluent nations in the world as they have hefty amount of resources which are being useless due to the dearth of employees. For instance, recent research concluded that in the'United Kingdom' $3 billion money is not being used on any kind of productive work every year.
In conclusion, accepting refugees by wealthy countries will give fundamental start to their lives as well as it will help nations to get progress. I , therefore, believe that it would create harmony among nations by helping others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
Refugees should be assisted with basic necessities of life by rich nations. This essay agr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 300, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...estart their life at another place with less efforts. For example, the USA and UK ha...
^^^^
Line 8, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arch concluded that in theUnited Kingdom billion money is not being used on any k...
^^
Line 8, column 553, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ch concluded that in theUnited Kingdom billion money is not being used on any kind of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing used on any kind of productive work every year. In conclusion, accepting ...
^^
Line 10, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... it will help nations to get progress. I , therefore, believe that it would create...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96762589928 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49071708288 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589928057554 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5805605142 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.545454545 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216024300253 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773042769402 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518879536045 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124806126138 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238413761865 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.