It is argued that humanitarian aid should be given to developing countries during natural catastrophe by developed countries. This essay agrees with this statement because developed nations have strong finance as well as needed equipment and the development relations between two countries may be improved in future.
There is no doubt that rich countries have a great source of advanced equipment and financial resources. For thousands of people in poorer countries are to suffer from many losses like casualties, deaths and diseases which makes the government difficult to dealt with. In addition, due to lack of money and necessary emergency supplies, the damage could be worse and there are fears that the death toll could rise. In such crucial situation, the aid emergency arrived to help with relief effort just in time is everything needed for the poor citizens. For instance, during 1990 a sudden earthquake struck in Egypt, Italia sent their rescued team to help the Egyptian authorities to discover tens of living people under building debris.
The relations between wealthy nations and the less affluent nations will be improved after all the supports. It’s not only the affected countries are beneficial but the rich countries have some upcoming advantages of making excellent business. The less affluent nations would be thankful for this assistance and have some policy adjustment for trading such as reducing taxes, paperwork ease and opportunities to expand market. In 2016, Vietnam suffered from a severe flood and the government of Japan offered financial help to Vietnamese people. In 2017, Vietnam reduces taxes by 5% for products imported from Japan.
To conclude, poorer countries should be assisted by rich countries to recover after facing severe natural disaster because wealthy nations are able to provide immediate assistance that poorer nations hardly can handle themselves and their relations will be further consolidated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s between two countries may be improved in future. There is no doubt that rich countri...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving people under building debris. The relations between wealthy nations an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, after all, for instance, in addition, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48026315789 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67321503084 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588815789474 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0236630397 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.153846154 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331451485014 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947262170065 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100783681046 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19904629485 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105284173291 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.