When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Having played a crucial role in people’s lives, money is largely believed to be a pivotal factor for employees when applying for a position. From my perspective, albeit its critical values enticing a number of job-holders, I would contend that a handsome wage is far from being the best option.
On the one hand, it is incontrovertible that a job entailed with lucrative salary might reasonably appeal to numerous applicants. The first justification to be cited is that a generous pay can act as powerful incentive to either engage or boost workers’ productivity and loyalty. Numerous graduates opt for jobs which are well-paid in order to return student loans and at least to liberate them from being financially dependent on their parents. Accordingly, these individuals are likely to set salary rates as a prerequisite regardless of the amount of workload or their respective job preference, and wholeheartedly exert their effort to complete their given tasks. Another rationale to elucidate this prevailing phenomenon is the irresistible lure of a large wage package for one to ensure a reasonable lifestyle. Undoubtedly, a number of high school seniors who are, more often than not, in the sheer dilemma of choosing a livelihood, would take the job’s remuneration into great consideration. Given the importance of financial resources, many have adopted high-paid vocations as the last resort.
However promising a salary offer might sound, I believe other job-related matters, namely working environment and conditions, are certainly not inferior. Working environment should be the first priority for an employee to decide whether or not to prolong a long term collaboration with one company. For example, if one perpetually endeavour to accomplish a given mission, but receives little acknowledgement from the employer whilst being disregarded by the unwarrantedly envious colleagues, he or she might give a second thought to a career change. That is to say, such unhealthy and disproportionate treatment with the absence of job contentment is unlikely to retain certain employees irrespective of high pay rates or considerable incentives. In terms of working conditions, a position involved with hazardous tasks may not appeal to job-seekers while the location of the company can afflict a number of workers as many would not favour the monotonous journey back and forth from work. Coupled with that, a job security comprising of one’s employment stability and continuance is also critical when selecting a livelihood. In other words, with little career prospects, an occupation might appear less captivating to the applicants.
In summary, salary has been largely taken into consideration amongst the job seekers; however, I rigidly believe that several factors pertaining to one’s ultimate choice of career should not be discounted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 863, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...btedly, a number of high school seniors who are, more often than not, in the sheer dile...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...irst priority for an employee to decide whether or not to prolong a long term collaboration wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1025, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...work. Coupled with that, a job security comprising of one’s employment stability and continua...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, while, at least, for example, in summary, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 442.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46380090498 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20110163185 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606334841629 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2054621828 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.058823529 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124794816551 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401325750248 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322910833515 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780061008293 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215132658097 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 78.4519038076 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.