Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The last 50 years have witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of the languages threatened with extinction worldwide. Some claim that these losses will lead to convenience in communication whereas the opponents especially linguists predict that adverse consequences are inevitable leaving substantially effects on distinct social issues. Although there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I would content that the preservation of language is of essence to the development of any civilizations.
It is pivotal importance that the death of a particular language would entail losses of valuable cultural heritage of certain areas. In fact, languages are not simply a collection of lexical words; however, they are living organisms which convey the connection and association of long-lasting belief, doctrine, customs and so on of a certain group of people, or in other word, culture. Therefore, the eradication of languages is major factor leading to cultural degradation. For example, fairy tales, folk songs, lullabies depicting the thoughts and moral lessons of former generations will be eased if the language of their ancestors no longer exists. This means that traditional values are gradually faded away.
Equally importantly, the eradication of languages widens the gap between generations. Since languages cannot be transmitted to latter generations, senior citizens find it challenging to communicate with youngsters who are likely to be attracted by a different world outside their community because of the expansion of globalization nowadays. Consequently, not only are the seniors but also juniors trapped in their own world filled with loneliness and isolation which contributing to numerous mental illness as well as other negative impacts on the heath of people and society. Furthermore, miscommunication and misunderstanding will gradually break the bonding between children and parents or, generally, between the younger generations and their ancestors. It seems that there is no either willingness or desire in children for delving into their origin, which leads to the fact that people become losing their identities in this modern world.
In conclusion, it is of essence that the extinction of certain languages poses serious threats to society, namely the cultural heritage and bonding among member different generations within a community and especially the degradation of cultural diversity of human society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...onal values are gradually faded away. Equally importantly, the eradication of languag...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'communicating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: communicating
...ns, senior citizens find it challenging to communicate with youngsters who are likely to be at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...their ancestors. It seems that there is no either willingness or desire in childre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71232876712 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14403825413 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597260273973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0786482542 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.928571429 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192242630515 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631091887448 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271547607748 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103594851021 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397220240536 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.