It is mostly argued that with the development of technology in a nation, the traditional techniques and ways of living become extinct and many believe that there is now point to use them continuously. I completely disagree with this opinion as mobbing away these skills only harms us and causes us a lot of problems as well.
Firstly, it has been observed a large number of times that without a foundation, a building can barely stand for just few months and similar even goes for the fastly developing and prospering nations, here just foundation is replaced by the ancestral skills and knowledge and building is replaced by a nation. The faster the advancement in technology develops the more we reach close to our end. Stephen Hawkings once said that the most important thing we should try to learn in our lives is the struggle made by our ancestors and ultimately these skills will be the only one to help us in cases of huge problems and dangers like climatic changes, etc.
Secondly, these words form Stephen Hawkings are been found true and there are a number of countries at the present time who are struggling a lot to move on with the changes that have been seen from past few decades. For instance, the Inuit people of Canada are in a lot of trouble as they earlier were taken away from their ancestral knowledge and were made to rely upon technology by the government but now due to limited knowledge of the area they raised their hand and as a result have pushed the Inuit’s in a storm that they can escape very rarely.
Overall, in my opinion, we should keep on developing our technology and gadgets but should never forget the knowledge and education that we get from our ancestors as these are the one which can help us survive in extreme conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...as well. Firstly, it has been observed a large number of times that without a foundation, a buil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...;s in a storm that they can escape very rarely. Overall, in my opinion, we should kee...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, well, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65923566879 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55442800608 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544585987261 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.2975951904 192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.6697550201 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.875 106.682146367 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.25 20.7667163134 189% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117799059994 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569738499168 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450630755463 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802780579705 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654257026267 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.1190380762 174% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.