Nowadays, most of the employer believe that hiring a person with an advanced degree is beneficial for the company while as per others employee must have interpersonal skills as well. I certainly disagree that having a degree only can make a candidate better than others. This essay will elaborate on facts to support my opinion.
For instance, an employee must possess skills such as communication, ethics, and congeniality. It is evident that candidates who are open to learning excel in their career, as they are more diverse and ready to explore countless dimensions. Also, it has been observed that people who do not possess any education they tend to be a self-learner and develop leadership skills their own. For example, Bill Gates discontinued his education at Harward to become an entrepreneur. With his self obtained skills, he founded Microsoft and is one of the richest people in the world. Similarly, several techs giants developed their management skills without attending management school and now they are successfully managing their companies and contributing to the growth of the economy.
On the flip side, people who are specialized in their fields undoubtedly excel in their career, but they tend to be more focussed on theoretical cognition than practical aspects hence they often develop tunnel vision. Also, by going to Universities, they are no guarantee that it will enhance their overall personality. To illustrate, numerous people employed in IT companies have degrees in technical fields yet they lack good communication skills and they are perceived as rude and unpleasant to work with. By evaluating a candidate based only on the degree does not ensure his ethics or his skills as a team player. These days to select a perfect candidate several recruiters are assessing them on their technical and interpersonal skills as well.
To recapitulate, to recruit a suitable employee, employers must assess their overall personality along with their education and capabilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...beneficial for the company while as per others employee must have interpersonal skills...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to excel'
Suggestion: to excel
...hat candidates who are open to learning excel in their career, as they are more diver...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, similarly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3427672956 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97101253281 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.151152628 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.266666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143186404113 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049938733762 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440677576065 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111352430899 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488428596762 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.