Public transportation has been a common medium of the commute from a long time. Several countries are developing fast traveling train to reduce commute time for the public. I strongly agree that officials should consider improving railway conditions to provide better transportation.
Firstly, by building more fast and efficient trains, the government can reduce the prices of gas. Gas oil prices have been skyrocketing since more people using cars for the daily commute. If railway conditions are improved, by adding more luxury, better seats, clean toilets, and entertainment, more people will be encouraged to take trains, which will be cost effective and affordable. Moreover, people enjoy their journey more when they are not driving, they can read newspapers, listen to music or chit chat with friends and family, because they do not have to focus on driving on the road, they can relax and enjoy their commute. Thus trains are much safer than cars. Nevertheless, the pollution caused by car fuel on the road can be reduced immensely by developing eco-friendly and power efficient trains.
Secondly, If more people travel by train for their work, the number of cars will be decreased drastically. Nowadays traffic is a huge issue in developing countries, this issue can be resolved if railway conditions are improved, thus people can save a lot of time by taking trains, people do not have to be stuck in traffic for hours and hours. The commute from metropolitan cities can take up to 2-3 hours every day, people can save this time and spend on their leisure or with their family.
In conclusion, if authorities develop more trains and encourage people to travel by train, the roads will be used less if railways are more efficient and improved. People can save their daily commute time and enjoy their train rides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nsportation has been a common medium of the commute from a long time. Several countries are...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e stuck in traffic for hours and hours. The commute from metropolitan cities can take up to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06953642384 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65744723153 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523178807947 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3009882479 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0789006191064 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316365635233 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363600530226 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518419748847 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208309583635 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.