Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is commonly considered by some that there is no point in allocating resources to the preservation of wildlife animals as they no longer have many natural habitats. Nevertheless, I completely disagree with this point of view. The justifications for this are as follows.
In my opinion, it is an irrefutable fact that biodiversity has a critical role to play in maintaining a balanced ecosystem. In other words, the disappearance of a single species would disrupt the entire food chain, affecting various other species of flora and fauna, which finally poses a threat to our existence. A salient example is that when there are few predators (especially ducks), grasshoppers could develop on a large scale, resulting in locust outbreaks that adversely affect many farmers’ crops.
I am also against the idea that protecting animals is a waste of money. To embark on, humans rely heavily on crops and agricultural plants for a variety of purposes, ranging from food to economy. However, if it were not for insects’ pollination, we would not be able to have bumper crops until now. As a result, agriculture could suffer if such pollen-carrying species as bees, birds, and butterflies are reduced to extinction.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my position that preserving animals is of great significance as it not only helps to deter an ecological crisis but also plays a crucial role in ensuring sustainable agriculture.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12446351931 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15053617191 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652360515021 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8293907246 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.545454545 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103347708851 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375623335835 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569184376129 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588780605386 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531955381249 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.