Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is waste of resources.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a school of thought that animals do not deserve to assure because of its squandering and their uselessness for human life. But I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion, animals living in the wild always have an important position at all times. It is an inconsideration to assert that they are not necessary for today's life. Earth's ecosystem will be fell in the hazardous if our planet lack of wildlife, and that is the enormous impact on life, activity, and livelihood of many people. The decreasing of wild animals is almost created by our process of industrialization, emissions, indiscriminate hunting, etc. In consequence, human habitat can be in a state of severity is ecological imbalance and the number of animal species was being extincted.
Furthermore, I do not argue that there is waste of resources to protect animals existing in the wild. Defending wildlife is defending our life, it can not say that protecting our own life is squandering. Plants, animals, human and environment constitute a biological community - an ecosystem where each of them depends on each other to survive. When a part of this community falls into an imbalanced or eliminated state, the entire ecosystem will suffer the terrible effects.
In conclusion, human being is not the only owner of Earth, this planet had many species lived here before us, so we do not have the right to assume that all the benefits of this earth belong to humankind only. Therefore, our all responsibility is to conserve wild animals, for existence of Earth, for our own sake.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99242424242 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98255041493 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587121212121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2046807752 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.384615385 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141570573889 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552085387976 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624691944823 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858365483819 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155723753787 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.