It is an obvious truth that female and male have different physical aspects or psychological manner. According to the common belief of the society, the jobs they have been applied to depends on these contradictions. In this essay, I will discuss how physical properties and society attitude rejected women and men from undertaking specific jobs.
For many years people believed that some posts are not suitable for female and some others for male. For example, women are fit for careers that require kindness, caring and patience. So nursing and teaching should be done by female. On the other side, male are more efficient at doing thing that need more bodily strength. Thus they should be employed in jobs such as mining and construction workers.
However, that view has no place in modern and free society. At the present time, people know different genders could bring various perspective into work. For this reason, the vast majority of professions, ignore the gender and consider equal opportunities for both women and men. In addition, there are enough evidence that in the mix-gender environment efficiency is higher. As a result, two factors of different attitude and more proficiency that mix gender team bring, make the organization more profitable.
To conclude, depriving men and women for certain tasks because of their gender is not fair and based on the above mentioned points, it seems like people should be selected for career based on their skills, abilities and educational background not their gender.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'depend'.
Suggestion: depend
...ety, the jobs they have been applied to depends on these contradictions. In this essay,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...g thing that need more bodily strength. Thus they should be employed in jobs such as...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2024291498 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65274576729 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647773279352 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5102555957 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7857142857 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253422764236 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691863370073 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565791424386 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147434125755 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547255666581 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.