As the world becomes technologically advanced, computers are replacing people at more jobs.
What are some job positions that may be lost because of computers? What are some problems that may result from this situation?
The invention of computers is perhaps one of the most exciting and complex achievements of human civilization. Indeed, these magic machines have transformed our lives tremendously. It has helped us in almost every aspect of our daily routine, including news and information, education, health care, transportation, safety and security, and many more. With the use of computers, the chances of mistakes are getting less and less. These machines are much more accurate and efficient as compared to us. Due to this reason, now-a-days there is a very common trend of incorporating more and more computers in the workplaces. This computerized automation, on one hand, is improving our quality of work, but on the other hand, leading to significant unemployment. In this essay, I would like to discuss about the positive and negative impact of computers on the employment.
At first, to understand this issue better, let us discuss about the type of jobs, that can be easily replaced by the computers. These include factory workers, banking employees, traffic managers, transportation workers, diagnostic specialists etcetera. Now as `i have mentioned earlier, by replacing these workers by computers, we can achieve a more professional outcome and minimal chance of errors. However, this will lead to a significant number of individuals, losing their jobs, for which they might have been trained for years.
Now let us talk about some critical areas, where complete automation may be counterproductive. These include medical system, security, air travel, education etcetera. These are the type of profession, where a great deal of instant decisions and comparative thinking is required. Hence in such professions, computers can surely help the professionals, but can not replace them.
To conclude, I would like to mention that although automation is a wonderful thing to have, but it would be better to establish an equilibrium between the computers and humans to avoid complete digital dependence and unemployment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-22 | utkarshshahi | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the average monthly maximum temperatures for three Australian cities in the year 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think healthcare should be made free for all people, while others believe people should pay for healthcare by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think personal happiness is directly related to economic success while others believe this depends on other factors Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think healthcare should be made free for all people, while others believe people should pay for healthcare by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'specialists'' or 'specialist's'?
Suggestion: specialists'; specialist's
...ers, transportation workers, diagnostic specialists etcetera. Now as 'i have mentioned...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...s and comparative thinking is required. Hence in such professions, computers can sure...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47284345048 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15768111031 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61661341853 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6604969371 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.764705882 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151428413692 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449850774756 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437963675789 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849005651522 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254099666363 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.