The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life. Why is it the case? Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future?
It has been claimed that a group of people being affected by the rapid changes in the world which force them to seek more employments is the staff. As for the reasons behind this, I am inclined to believe that the more demands they need in life, the more efforts they have to pay. IN order to address this problem, hardly can we deny that there would be more incentives to those who simultaneously do more than two jobs.
To assess the factor that drives people to job-hop, we must bring the status quo of this society into perspective. Assuming an individual just made a good living, he or she could not afford to take care of themselves or even their family members as well as he would have if he had had another job. Not only can they access some new realms, but they can also decrease stresses or depressions through a new working environment. Either asking for a promotion or winning the trust of colleagues, for instance, will not be out of the question. Another reason why employees want to be a new candidate is a wide range of welfares.
Although so far, one can readily draw the conclusion that in practice job-switching is difficult to do, we must look on the bright side before judging whether having more than one job could be an advantage or not. A lucrative job always requires a high-skilled workforce who has fundamental knowledge and is ceaselessly able to gears up new skills as much as possible. Therefore, when a mammoth enterprise has a highly qualified workforce, real values would be created, which upgrade the life quality of the workers. On top of that, verbal communicating skills must be neither overlooked nor underestimated if a sideline is desired.
Taking the reason into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that job-switching is no longer a bad phenomenon, but from now on it can be the solution for some who can not meet their needs. From where I stand, should you find it hard to obey the circle of life, job-hopping is the light at the end of the tunnel you can try.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61944444444 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73928749635 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.8370193361 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178866506559 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560163942592 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360878575006 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103027652221 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349954725087 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.