The world would be a much poorer place without colour. To what extent would you agree or disagree?
It is not deniable that colour is a great blessing that God has bestowed upon human life. I totally agree with the opinion that human life would become not meaningful if there is not the exit of colour.
There are many reasonable reasons why colour is an integral part of life. Firstly, human beings can distinguish objects exactly through their colour. It is obvious that hearing or touch alone is not enough to define a objects. For example, a farmer will not be able to pick a ripening apple instead of newer ones without colour. Secondly, following several recent research, colour can make significant contributions to medical treatments. A good example can be seen in blue colour. This one painted on bedroom walls can help sleepless disorder patients fall into asleep more easily.
In addition, deciding which kinds of colour used to promote can be a difficult question that every commercial company have to answer. Take the firm’s logos for example. Although the colour is just a part of their logos, it can help these organizations gain a competitive edge and capture customer’s attention if the logos appear in a suitable colour. As a result, they could maximize their profits. Furthermore, the role of colour can be seen more clearly through culture. In fact, each colour expresses a specific cultural meaning. For example, red is a symbol of love while white is a colour of mourning. Therefore, colour plays a vital role in making the diversity of culture and creating cultural identity.
In conclusion, colour is of great significance to various aspects of human life such as communication, medical care, commercial activities and culture. It is not doubted that life will become more boring without colour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... or touch alone is not enough to define a objects. For example, a farmer will not...
^
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a object' or simply 'objects'?
Suggestion: a object; objects
... or touch alone is not enough to define a objects. For example, a farmer will not be able...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06643356643 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76755485418 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6733730122 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2631578947 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0526315789 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176162371257 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570270484351 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457573368672 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112387139631 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024354240973 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.