Advanced technology comes with a dilemma of whether we should restrict our children's screen time or not. While electronic devices may have positive influence on kids, I would argue that limited use is critical in some
Agreement
This word does not agree with the other words around it. Check your grammar.
Perhaps ‘cases’ is better.
case.
On the one hand, young generation can benefit from using latest technology. In the future, smartphones will continue to evolve and it is a good idea to allow our children to get used to it from a very young age. This can make them become tech savy in the long run. In addition, internet contains a valuable source of information, thus youngsters can learn new knowledge or even new skills by surfing websites from home. For example, everytime children have a question that can not be explained by their caregivers, they can use Google search to look up the answer.
On the other hand, excessive screen time may prevent children from outdoor activities and social interaction. Smartphones and tablets can be addictive and time-consuming. If kids spend too much time on playing video games, the risk of them getting chronical diseases is likely to increase due to lack of physical activity. Their engagement to social relationships will also drop. This can create tremendous affect to their physical and mental health. Furthermore, there is many toxic content online such as violence, pornography,.. which will poison a child's mind.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that technology plays a crucial role in children's development. However, it is clear that we need to set a limitation in terms of children time spent on the Internet as well as their viewed content.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gue that limited use is critical in some Agreement This word does not agree with...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Case
...ammar. Perhaps ‘cases’ is better. case. On the one hand, young generation c...
^^^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'using the latest'.
Suggestion: using the latest
...hand, young generation can benefit from using latest technology. In the future, smartphones ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 529, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ent online such as violence, pornography,.. which will poison a childs mind. In...
^^
Line 11, column 530, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...nt online such as violence, pornography,.. which will poison a childs mind. In ...
^^
Line 11, column 533, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...online such as violence, pornography,.. which will poison a childs mind. In conclu...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 533, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...online such as violence, pornography,.. which will poison a childs mind. In conclu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10600706714 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79188171376 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65371024735 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9991134668 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2777777778 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7222222222 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153735568339 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403392463142 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496199576926 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737482082508 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456467795886 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.