Nowadays, various kinds of methods for being informed nationally and globally are accessible to individuals. Even by technology revolutionized and abundant variety of electric devices, radio and television are still the most popular ones. Some people, including me, believe that radio has distinct advantages and carries more weight for transferring news than TV. In this essay, both sides of opinion besides my point of view will be discussed.
On the one hand, although, some people think that TV is the most common ways for updating news and gaining worldwide information because of attracting scenes and its visual feature, it is not accessible and practical tool in every place. As an example, transit drivers who work at all days and nights and focusing on the roads is their job’s necessities cannot look at the TV during their duties but radio would be a good choice for them. Additionally, television due to expose different lights are dangerous for our body especially for eyes with regard to this issue that most of the vision disorders are caused by TV.
On the other hand, radio has a significant feature that could change it to the best media for spreading news. Firstly, as radio has a simple wave-based system, it is inevitable that can be run on nearly all gadgets even low-technology ones. Secondly, with regard to the environmentally friendly issue, it is our responsibility to use energy-saving devices and obviously, radio consume less electricity than television. Therefore, this is a good choice for people who cannot afford or live in areas with poor economic.
In conclusion, while some may advocate for TV, I think that has some drawbacks with regard to eyes disorders and unreachable every place. In addition, due to the positive effects of using radio including availability and low-consumption energy, my definite idea is that radio can be appropriate media for sharing news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 366, Rule ID: LOOK_WATCH[3]
Message: Did you mean 'watch'?
Suggestion: watch
... is their job's necessities cannot look at the TV during their duties but radio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1575562701 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94187794393 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594855305466 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3905475305 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.384615385 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4615384615 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265367222572 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091258190231 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533903577235 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161231428379 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192691998733 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.