Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation.
Why is this the case?
What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people?
As the world evolves, the internet has become an integral part of our life in these contemporary times. Hence, In comparison with the past, millennial generation tend to be highly influential than their preceding generation. It is more likely that the original rationale behind it is the advanced mindset, and it certainly has an effect on the relationship between juniors and seniors.
First, one of the primary cause is the evolved mindset. To enumerate, the cutting-edge technology has changed the way of thinking of the youth as they can acquire encyclopedic knowledge instantly from the World Wide Web, which deems as a treasure trove of information. Thus, this extensive information contributes to unlocking brains’ potential, so young people in the modern world incline to be superior to the past times. For example, when Mark Zuckerberg established Facebook, he merely was in the twenties.
Second, the implications of this development negatively impact on the relationship between the elderly and the youth, which cannot be overlooked. Unfortunately, different sentiments are aroused between them since young people consider internet indispensable, on contrary, the elderly conceive it as a waste of time and energy. For instance, the elderly are less likely to believe that the young people not only could work remotely but also do online shopping, distant learning. Therefore, less interaction occurs because young people are preoccupied with technologically advanced appliances, so the gap between them is growing larger.
In conclusion, the informational age seems esoteric to the youth. Accordingly, they are more powerful as well as effective, and this leads to segregate seniors from juniors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54372623574 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12584068988 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631178707224 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2067493307 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.153846154 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272014766704 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765649076449 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604054344478 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134808538475 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564327067839 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.