young people nowadays do not give enough time to help their communities
This is obvious that young people nowadays are busy and they are involved in the lot of social activities. But, is it that means that young people do not give enough time to helping their communities? Young people are important part of every community and portion of their population is considered as a vital indicator for development. There are a lot of factors that effect on young people attitudes and behaviours. In addition, the interaction between young people and community is complex. I rather disagree with the statement. I will discuss my point of view in the following paragraphs.
First, in our modern life, education and knowledge are critical factors for development and this is clear that developed countries have high proportion of educated people and investments and achievement of those communities are related to these persons. However, young people today spend more time for education than young people whom lived fifty years ago. Especially, in developing countries this is more obvious, they are interested in sciences and arts and most of them have academic degree or they are studying in universities. Although they attempt to get their own goals, indirectly their efforts would be beneficial for community. Increased of number of high educated people will rise culture, peace, and that would be boom in sciences and technology. In daily news we hear that young scientists invent a robot which can be helpful for old people that live alone or software that is very useful for blind persons.
Second, competition is a powerful factor, which encourages young people to hard work and be creative persons. There is no doubt that nowadays resource of equipment is decreased and population size is increased faster than before. Number of young people is massive, especially in developing countries, and there are limited job opportunities for young people in these communities. Persons in these ages need to have a good job, restriction in job positions lead to presence of drastic competition condition. In this situation, young people attempt to get these jobs and they have to work hard and achieve some important qualities. They do not have any time for wasting they only focused on their futures and their motivation are a lot. The results and effects of this competition are helpful and profitable for community. In my country, the number of doctoral students is high but there are small available positions for assistant professor. Students know situation and from first year to four year they study hard, they do projects and they write articles to have a good chance to getting available positions. These attempts will increase their capacity for research and teaching. Thus best one will be a university professor who can teach young students and help them and indirectly be a helpful member of community.
To put it in a nutshell, although young people nowadays do not have enough time to helping their community, they are more profitable and helpful for their society than before. These generations are hard worker, motivated persons. They like to be success and they show their effort to help their community with inventions, books, articles and knowledge.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, in addition, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 13.1623246493 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 10.4138276553 298% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 24.0651302605 233% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 1615.20841683 165% => OK
No of words: 520.0 315.596192385 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14038461538 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73962202615 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469230769231 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 832.5 506.74238477 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2421631323 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2592592593 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.37037037037 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420580642677 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128808968766 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158788755616 0.0667982634062 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337517632465 0.151304729494 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146963978958 0.056905535591 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.