All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
In today’s motor driven world the concept of electric cars is gaining attention and appreciation declining the production of vehicles running on natural resource fuels. I agree with this notion as the electric cars are energy efficient and environment friendly.
Electric cars are energy efficient since they operate on reusable energy sources. While, the fossil fuels undergo irreversible reactions and could be utilized once only hence are being depleted as a consequence of increased consumption. Moreover, they are lighter on the pocket as the ever-increasing demand has caused a rise in fuel prices. Electric cars have one time high buying cost but they are fuel efficient and hence are better in long run. For example, Electric cars produced by Mitsubishi have high average and run on energy driven from solar panels.
Electricity driven cars are non-polluting. Electric cars run on electricity hence discharging practically zero pollutants to the air. Decrease in emissions results in cleaner and safer atmosphere. They also have advantage of long engine life since there is no knocking effect like in combustion engine of fossil fuel driven cars. On the other hand, toxins like CO2, lead and arsenics are released into the environment in high quantity by the vehicles running on fossil fuels. The recently launched hybrid electric cars by Honda have proven to be environment friendly as they have zero expulsion of gases.
I support the promotion of increased production of motor vehicles dependent on use of electric fuel instead of fossil resources. This will in large help preserve the natural surroundings and saving the fossil resources.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42528735632 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83248804159 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8608918961 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244768232604 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927815532098 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511462236122 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153849986999 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362946570409 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.