All parents want the best opportunity for their children. There are some people who think schools should teach children skills but others think having a huge range of subjects is better for a child's future. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?
Every parent dream and strive to give best of everything to their children, be it education, skills, ethics, etc. While some put a lot of emphasis on having multiple subjects, others weigh the skills more over literature.
I feel it is equally important to create a balance between bookish knowledge and extra cirricular activities. It is very important to know your roots, history, the surroundings, the civic science, etc. and to know all of this, the books are your best friend, thus, the necessity of various subjects. These days we see that schools are putting in a lot of effort to ensure every aspect which is required to groom an individual is been taken into consideration. Thereby, increasing the number of subjects, introducing a lot of new subjects and syllabus to address the need of different category of students.
On contrary, some parents and schools are more keen on banking on the skills of their children and student respectively. They would encourage the schools to focus more on the hidden talent or skill of their children and bring out the best of it. They want their children to be groomed on those skills and school should help them with the process. And we have seen many of private schools have included extra ciricular activities like sports, music, dance, painting, etc. as a part of their syllabus.
As per my opinion, parents should let their child decide if they want to be Einstein or Sachin Tendulkar. It is very important to give them a choice to select their career option. It is necessary to strive a balance between subject knowledge and skills. As they say, the future is unknown but one should always do what makes them happy.
Comments
Every parent desires the…
Every parent desires the finest opportunities for their offspring. As many people say, teaching various skills should be added in the academic curriculum for students but some think studying different subjects helps a child to build a better future. In my opinion, both have pros and cons.
Firstly, I agree that introducing basic co-curricular activities with the educational studies will definitely shape a child in a distinct manner rather than them not learning about any skill at all.
When a child focuses on diverse subjects, he gets an idea about the real world where becoming a doctor and an engineer is as valuable as becoming an athlete or an actor. Sometimes, they even have a superior living standard than a degree holder.
Secondly, When the students are not forced to just read the range of subjects like history and math they can actually explore what they genuinely want to do and become. Hence, the student can decide a life that he/she wishes to build and work hard for it.
On the contrary, teaching them just regular subjects in school does not leave any space for any kind of a distraction. When they study what they have to they don't have the time to focus on other things outside their books. This will help them to get a basic degree first and complete a level of basic education that is necessary and important for all the students.
To conclude, I genuinely think finishing primary level studies for all students must be mandatory but allowing them to choose a career and motivating them to build a life of their own dream and choice is as crucial as earning a degree by obliging them to gain knowledge on something they are not even interested in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould always do what makes them happy.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89198606272 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59299474564 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578397212544 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8338497977 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.75 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259417092835 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797416433963 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614459739856 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152006896027 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681006799231 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.