Cutthroat business culture is so prevalent that people are discussing how to improve workplace environment. One of their suggestions is that companies should embrace equality in the workplace and grant all eligible employees the same number of vacation leave annually. From my perspective, this idea is far from viable despite some potential benefits.
Admittedly, there are several advantages of granting all employees the equal days of annual leave. The immediate one is that this employee-friendly policy could effectively enhance a corporate image. With an emphasis on equality in the workplace, the company is more likely to retain excellent workers and attract professional elites to join the teamwork. In addition, the equal welfare is conducive to higher staff morale given the fact that all workers, regardless of their positions, are able to get fully recharged and rejuvenated after taking a break. Better yet, they would show more commitment to their duties, eventually contributing to greater productivity and efficiency in work. However, these benefits mentioned above do not necessarily imply that this egalitarian concept is completely applicable to real situations.
In fact, granting all workers the equal days of vacations causes scheduling problems. If more than 10 employees request a vacation leave within the same time slot, this will bring about three problems. First and foremost, employers might find it difficult to seek substitutes who are competent for the jobs. Second, the unfinished work will increase colleagues’ workload. Third, it is hard to run normal business when there are not enough workers at a company.
Unfairness among all staff is another repercussion of this employee-friendly policy. Compared with common employees, senior managers take more responsibility and handle more time-consuming jobs such as budgets, planning and personnel affairs. They devote all their energy and time to their work. However, common employees whose jobs are to deal with easier daily routines usually work regularly and go home on time. Therefore, it is unfair to senior managers if they share the same days of holidays with their subordinates.
In conclusion, the idea of offering employees equal days of vacations is completely unacceptable. This practice leads to the difficulty of scheduling, unfairness, and a negative workplace environment. Hence, all companies should not follow this trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58265582656 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05455280117 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59620596206 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8804546347 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6363636364 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7727272727 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184727199596 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529521984353 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595245045987 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108923091466 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033481968862 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.