In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about how to improve employees’ welfare. This has led to a suggestion that companies should prioritize equality in the workplace and give all workers the same number of vacation leaves every year. However, I completely disagree with this idea to a large extent for three reasons.
To begin with, the policy that emphasizes equality in the workplace causes scheduling problems. If more than 10 employees request an annual leave within the same time slot, this will bring about three problems. First, employers might find it difficult to seek substitutes who are competent for the jobs. Second, the unfinished work will increase colleagues’ workload. Third, it is hard to run normal business when a company is understaffed.
In addition, unfairness and disagreement might arise among all staff. In comparison with common staff, senior managers take more responsibility and handle more time-consuming jobs such as budgets, planning and personnel affairs. They usually devote all their energy and time to their work. However, common employees whose jobs are to deal with easier daily routines usually work regularly and go home on time. Therefore, it is unfair to senior managers if they share the same days of holidays with their subordinates.
Last but not least, this equality-oriented initiative demotivates part of the employees, making them reluctant to strive for the best. For instance, employees are more likely to lose passion for their jobs if a company grants all workers the same days of annual leave and holiday pay. After all, no matter how hard they work, they enjoy the same privilege of vacation leave. Nonetheless, if giving extra holidays to workers can become a bonus, workers might be spurred to show more commitment to their company in the hope of getting more days off.
In conclusion, the idea of offering employees equal days of vacations is completely unacceptable. This practice leads to the difficulty of scheduling, unfairness, and a negative workplace environment. Hence, all companies should not follow this trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...reement might arise among all staff. In comparison with common staff, senior managers take...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, after all, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 32.9175257732 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 937.175257732 189% => OK
No of words: 334.0 206.0 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30838323353 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.78020617076 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89123134466 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 127.690721649 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 290.88556701 188% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9447713205 44.8134815571 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.65 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 16.8248392259 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 4.34317383033 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.49484536082 535% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212167845627 0.216113520407 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630819521074 0.0766984524023 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659818709521 0.0603063233224 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127798846019 0.12726935374 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686897908072 0.0580467560999 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 8.37731958763 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 41.2886597938 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.