Almost everyone agrees that we should be training children to recycle waste to save the Earth s natural resources Some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste Others argue that school is the best place to teach do t

None can deny that children of these days should be taught to save the natural resources of the earth by recycling waste. While some believe that it is the responsibility of the parents to teach them, others are in an argument that teachers are accountable to train children. It should be taught in such a way that it is learnt and practiced by the children from their young age so that it becomes a healthy habit for them and they can inculcate the behavior to the future generations. This essay will discuss whether it should be taught by the parents or the teacher before giving my own view.

On one hand, parents are the role model for the children for all their deeds since they look upto them from their childhood days. If a parent takes care of nature in all possible ways, the children will inherit the character and give utmost importance to conserve nature. Take an instance of city of Hong-kong where children do community activities such as coastal cleanup, paintings the walls of public schools along with their parents from the age of three. As a result, the city does not have any specific person to do the cleaning job.

On the other hand, few people are in an opinion that school is the best place for the children to learn about waste recycling. Since kids spend most of their day with their peers in school, they tend to practice effortlessly about preserving the natural resources. For example, activities such as inter-school exhibition, museum visit and planting trees in school not only cultivate the habit of saving nature but also get the knowledge of natural resources effectively. Therefore, it proves that school is the best place for the children to learn about waste management.

Taking both the argument into consideration, my view is on the former than the later. So, I think parents should involve themselves in teaching about recycling waste from valuable resources such as water, air and landfills to eliminate pollution, contamination or other forms of natural disaster. Every parent should take a pledge to save earth for the current as well as future generations.

Votes
Average: 5.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86944444444 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59093713681 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530555555556 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5284836502 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.866666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388869584955 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127419268412 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753495142902 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223736411478 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664581977305 0.056905535591 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.