In the current society, a democratic society needs to protect the resident by paying social welfare is under consideration. Social welfare is an essential element of an advanced society. The good system is always abused but that does not mean they are faulty.
On the one hand, the original purpose of this policy is to protect a group of people who are unable to earn basic living funds, such as single-parent, the disabled and the sick. Moreover, the unemployed also has the right to an income as they have paid in the past entitles them to assistance.
Meanwhile, this policy can help to reduce the crime rate. If the money is not available to make a living, people will commit crimes in order to survive. For instance, theft, robbery, etc. Crime increases not only dangerous but costly. Maintaining law and order requires the use of a large number of police and materials.
On the other hand, some citizens undermine the original meaning of the policy because of excessive reliance on this policy. For the unemployed who are able to work, this policy should only be a short-term help. However, they thought that they should be funded by the government, then they stopped looking for work. Over time, moreover, the labor force is lost, it will also increase government expenditure.
In my point of view, this policy can help people who are not able to work, but the government needs to take time to judge whether applicants have an urgent need to use this policy. Otherwise, it will only waste public money, and cannot help people in real need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ining law and order requires the use of a large number of police and materials. On the other h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82835820896 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51763660934 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9874980463 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.875 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126338218763 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401936388016 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624871589598 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077352264733 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096901022941 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.