the animals have no place in the 21century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. to what extent do you agree or disagree.
Allocating resource to animal's preservation projects is a waste of money and time because the endangered and wild animals will be extinct in the recent century. I completely against this idea because it sounds really egoistic and there is no reason to give human this right to suffer or hunt any kind of animals.
The most important reason why we should preserve other animals is that we share the planet with them and humans are not surpassing animals. Some people believe that animals are not beneficial at all and no matter whether they extinct or being hunted. However, it is completely wrong because animals keep the nature balanced and extinction of even one kind might disrupt the life cycle and food chain. Besides, such these thinking rooted in a great deal of egoism and selfishness because all living things have the right to live and humans have invaded animals and plants territories by polluting their habitats or killing them.
Furthermore, wildlife preservation leads to great discoveries and knowledge acquisition in the future. It means, not only it is morally wrong to kill animals just because they are wild, but also it deprives our next generation seeing them and being educated. Moreover, the advance of science is discovering new facts day by day and after a while, scientists might understand that for example, an extinction animal's milk could be the cure of cancer, but how could it happen when that animal did not exist anymore?
To conclude, preserving wildlife consume time and money and some people might consider that redundant but in my point of view killing other animal is morally wrong as well as it would be harmful to ourselves and our future too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facts'' or 'fact's'?
Suggestion: facts'; fact's
...e advance of science is discovering new facts day by day and after a while, scientist...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, well, while, for example, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97183098592 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53169748672 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.484636742 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.2 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128483134124 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519887203885 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307081678559 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07535189059 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368448990422 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.